From tale@rpi.edu Mon Oct 21 16:09:04 1991 Control: newgroup rec.arts.sf.reviews moderated Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.reviews.ctl Path: rpi!rpi!tale From: tale@rpi.edu (David C Lawrence) Subject: newgroup rec.arts.sf.reviews moderated Message-ID: Sender: tale@cs.rpi.edu Nntp-Posting-Host: cs.rpi.edu Date: 21 Oct 91 05:03:32 GMT Approved: tale@rpi.edu Lines: 43 rec.arts.sf-reviews is a moderated newsgroup which passed its vote for creation by 342:25 as reported in news.announce.newgroups on 8 May 1991. rec.arts.sf.reviews supersedes it as per the 714:86 vote in the rec.arts.sf reorganization results announced on 13 October 1991. For your newsgroups file: rec.arts.sf.reviews Critiques of science fiction stories. (Moderated) Group submission address: sf-reviews@presto.ig.com Moderator contact address: sf-reviews@presto.ig.com (Michael C. Berch, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes, Evelyn Leeper, Wayne Throop, Alan Wexelblat, & Bill Wisner) The charter, culled from the call for votes: rec.arts.sf-reviews will be a moderated newsgroup, under shared moderation, whose purpose is to distribute reviews and critical reviews of works of interest to the science fiction/fantasy/horror community. "Works" includes but is not limited to: books, short stories, movies, "graphic novels," and any other publically-available media. "Of interest to the sf/f/h community" will be interpreted liberally by the sitting moderator. The discussion period for the creation of this group has led to the conclusion that nonfiction or other kinds of fiction by and/or about sf/f/h writers would be permitted, as well as non-fiction of a sort related to one of the above (e.g., speculative science books or mythographies). Reviews of individual episodes or issues of continuing TV series, comic books, etc., would most likely _not_ be permitted; however, reviews of such series as a whole, or of large "arcs" of such series, would most likely be permitted. As noted, however, this would be up to the judgement of the sitting moderator, as influenced by the readership. Multiple reviews of the same work(s) will be welcome, as will single reviews of multiple works. Comments on reviews will be passed to the newsgroup on a _highly_ selective basis: generally, they must say something new about the work, rather than simply discussing the review. This is not intended to stifle debate but to keep the content/noise ratio as high as possible. From tale@rpi.edu Wed Nov 20 09:50:17 1991 Control: newgroup rec.arts.sf.reviews moderated Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.reviews.ctl Path: rpi!rpi!tale From: tale@rpi.edu (David C Lawrence) Subject: newgroup rec.arts.sf.reviews moderated Message-ID: <05-qg!p@rpi.edu> Sender: tale@cs.rpi.edu Nntp-Posting-Host: cs.rpi.edu Date: 20 Nov 91 14:50:00 GMT Approved: tale@rpi.edu Lines: 43 rec.arts.sf-reviews is a moderated newsgroup which passed its vote for creation by 342:25 as reported in news.announce.newgroups on 8 May 1991. rec.arts.sf.reviews supersedes it as per the 714:86 vote in the rec.arts.sf reorganization results announced on 13 October 1991. For your newsgroups file: rec.arts.sf.reviews Critiques of science fiction stories. (Moderated) Group submission address: sf-reviews@presto.ig.com Moderator contact address: sf-reviews@presto.ig.com (Michael C. Berch, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes, Evelyn Leeper, Wayne Throop, Alan Wexelblat, & Bill Wisner) The charter, culled from the call for votes: rec.arts.sf-reviews will be a moderated newsgroup, under shared moderation, whose purpose is to distribute reviews and critical reviews of works of interest to the science fiction/fantasy/horror community. "Works" includes but is not limited to: books, short stories, movies, "graphic novels," and any other publically-available media. "Of interest to the sf/f/h community" will be interpreted liberally by the sitting moderator. The discussion period for the creation of this group has led to the conclusion that nonfiction or other kinds of fiction by and/or about sf/f/h writers would be permitted, as well as non-fiction of a sort related to one of the above (e.g., speculative science books or mythographies). Reviews of individual episodes or issues of continuing TV series, comic books, etc., would most likely _not_ be permitted; however, reviews of such series as a whole, or of large "arcs" of such series, would most likely be permitted. As noted, however, this would be up to the judgement of the sitting moderator, as influenced by the readership. Multiple reviews of the same work(s) will be welcome, as will single reviews of multiple works. Comments on reviews will be passed to the newsgroup on a _highly_ selective basis: generally, they must say something new about the work, rather than simply discussing the review. This is not intended to stifle debate but to keep the content/noise ratio as high as possible. From news@Micrognosis.Campbell.CA.US Mon Dec 2 18:34:44 1991 Path: rpi!usenet.coe.montana.edu!decwrl!uunet!fernwood!micrognosis!news From: news@Micrognosis.Campbell.CA.US (news) Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.reviews.ctl Subject: newgroup rec.arts.sf.reviews moderated Message-ID: <439@miccal.CAMPBELL.CA.US> Date: 2 Dec 91 20:43:04 GMT Control: newgroup rec.arts.sf.reviews moderated Distribution: micrognosis Organization: Micrognosis, Campbell, CA USA Lines: 0 Approved: news@Micrognosis.Campbell.CA.US From damir@exchange.GBA.NYU.EDU Wed Apr 1 16:41:03 1992 Path: rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!pacbell.com!UB.com!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!news.ans.net!cmcl2!exchange!damir From: damir@exchange.GBA.NYU.EDU (Damir Mijacika) Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.reviews.ctl Subject: newgroup rec.arts.sf.reviews Message-ID: <23541@exchange.GBA.NYU.EDU> Date: 1 Apr 92 16:23:56 GMT Control: newgroup rec.arts.sf.reviews Distribution: nyu Organization: NYU Stern School of Business Lines: 0 Approved: damir@exchange.GBA.NYU.EDU From schnoebe@convex.com Wed Apr 1 22:56:42 1992 Control: newgroup rec.arts.sf.reviews moderated Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.reviews Path: rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!cs.utexas.edu!mercury.unt.edu!mips.mitek.com!convex!schnoebe From: schnoebe@convex.com (Eric Schnoebelen) Subject: chkgrps mess fixup for texas. Message-ID: <1992Apr2.023154.4094@news.eng.convex.com> Sender: usenet@news.eng.convex.com (news access account) Nntp-Posting-Host: orion.convex.com Organization: DFW regional news administration. Distribution: tx Date: Thu, 2 Apr 1992 02:31:54 GMT Approved: schnoebe@convex.com X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and not necessarily those of CONVEX. Lines: 7 Lets see if we can fix up in texas what someone else messed up globally. If it leaks, well, someone else gets the fruit of my labors. :-) -- Eric Schnoebelen eric@cirr.com schnoebe@convex.com "Usenet is a right, a left, a jab, and a sharp uppercut to the jaw. The postman hits! You have new mail." -- Ed Vielmetti From tale@uunet.uu.net Thu Apr 2 00:58:50 1992 Control: newgroup rec.arts.sf.reviews moderated Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.reviews.ctl Path: rpi!usenet.coe.montana.edu!decwrl!uunet!tale From: tale@uunet.uu.net (David C Lawrence) Subject: newgroup rec.arts.sf.reviews moderated Message-ID: <1992Apr2.054914.21297@uunet.uu.net> Organization: UUNET Communications Services Distribution: nyu Date: Thu, 2 Apr 1992 05:49:14 GMT Approved: tale@uunet.uu.net A newgroup message sent by damir@exchange.GBA.NYU.EDU (Damir Mijacika) erroneously unmoderated this group. This control message is being posted to the same group and distribution as the incorrect message. From steve@gandalf.UMCS.Maine.EDU Sun Apr 26 12:49:21 1992 Path: rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!decwrl!bu.edu!dartvax!mars.caps.maine.edu!gandalf!steve From: steve@gandalf.UMCS.Maine.EDU (Steve E. Goldsmith) Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.reviews.ctl Subject: newgroup rec.arts.sf.reviews Message-ID: <16466@gandalf.UMCS.Maine.EDU> Date: 26 Apr 92 00:18:44 GMT Control: newgroup rec.arts.sf.reviews Distribution: umcs Organization: University of Maine Department of Computer Science Lines: 0 Approved: steve@gandalf.UMCS.Maine.EDU From steve@gandalf.UMCS.Maine.EDU Sun Apr 26 13:24:49 1992 Path: rpi!usenet.coe.montana.edu!decwrl!bu.edu!dartvax!mars.caps.maine.edu!gandalf!steve From: steve@gandalf.UMCS.Maine.EDU (Steve E. Goldsmith) Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.reviews.ctl Subject: newgroup rec.arts.sf.reviews moderated Message-ID: <17377@gandalf.UMCS.Maine.EDU> Date: 26 Apr 92 01:38:49 GMT Control: newgroup rec.arts.sf.reviews moderated Distribution: umcs Organization: University of Maine Department of Computer Science Lines: 0 Approved: steve@gandalf.UMCS.Maine.EDU From tale@uunet.uu.net Mon Apr 27 00:40:16 1992 Control: newgroup rec.arts.sf.reviews moderated Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.reviews.ctl Path: rpi!usenet.coe.montana.edu!decwrl!gossip.pyramid.com!uunet!tale From: tale@uunet.uu.net (David C Lawrence) Subject: newgroup rec.arts.sf.reviews moderated Message-ID: <1992Apr27.033220.29842@uunet.uu.net> Organization: UUNET Technologies, Inc Distribution: umcs Date: Mon, 27 Apr 1992 03:32:20 GMT Approved: tale@uunet.uu.net Lines: 9 This group was inadvertently changed to unmoderated by a leaked newgroup message from gandalf.umcs.maine.edu. It is properly a moderated newsgroup. This control message is posted to the same group and distribution as the erroneous one. David Lawrence moderator, news.announce.newgroups From news@saunix.sau.edu Fri Aug 22 12:06:01 1997 Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.reviews Message-ID: <5tkm8v$5c180@news.sau.edu> From: news@saunix.sau.edu Approved: news@saunix.sau.edu NNTP-Posting-Host: news.sau.edu Path: news.isc.org!vixie!data.ramona.vix.com!nnrp1.crl.com!news.znet.com!www.nntp.primenet.com!globalcenter1!news.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!infeed1.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!167.142.225.6!newsrelay.netins.net!news.sau.edu!news.sau.edu Date: 22 Aug 1997 18:37:19 GMT Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Subject: cmsg newgroup rec.arts.sf.reviews y Control: newgroup rec.arts.sf.reviews y Lines: 3 Xref: news.isc.org control.newgroup:8849 Control message generated by Netscape Collabra Server. From group-admin@isc.org Tue Sep 2 18:00:04 1997 Path: news.isc.org!bounce-back From: group-admin@isc.org (David C Lawrence) Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.reviews Subject: cmsg newgroup rec.arts.sf.reviews moderated Control: newgroup rec.arts.sf.reviews moderated Approved: newgroups-request@isc.org Message-ID: <873247681.5286@isc.org> Date: Wed, 03 Sep 1997 00:48:01 GMT Lines: 42 X-Info: ftp://ftp.isc.org/pub/pgpcontrol/README.html ftp://ftp.isc.org/pub/pgpcontrol/README X-PGP-Sig: 2.6.2 Subject,Control,Message-ID,Date,From,Sender iQCVAwUBNAyzwsJdOtO4janBAQFLeQP/XuN73NkwbnibY9zf8CiFj/Cv2Hkb+hTL jaTsTeJgHjjsFhYItZfYSmp8GeZzo9jFuNbmzyJ5+bJ9ijWxbIFKWWcwShPWtSaN caaoTzYZ/xpnlrWjeav/wp9tH9GropE/MVZn1u8jDC+Mqsw2TqrI0S+5cNcrgh3I ybdw5Ri3fy0= =c047 Xref: news.isc.org control.newgroup:9222 rec.arts.sf.reviews is a moderated newsgroup which passed its vote for creation by 714:86 as reported in news.announce.newgroups on 13 Oct 1991. Group submission address: sf-reviews@postmodern.com Moderator contact address: sf-reviews@postmodern.com (Michael C. Berch, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes, Evelyn Leeper, Wayne Throop, Alan Wexelblat, & Bill Wisner) For your newsgroups file: rec.arts.sf.reviews Critiques of science fiction stories. (Moderated) The charter, culled from the call for votes: rec.arts.sf-reviews will be a moderated newsgroup, under shared moderation, whose purpose is to distribute reviews and critical reviews of works of interest to the science fiction/fantasy/horror community. "Works" includes but is not limited to: books, short stories, movies, "graphic novels," and any other publically-available media. "Of interest to the sf/f/h community" will be interpreted liberally by the sitting moderator. The discussion period for the creation of this group has led to the conclusion that nonfiction or other kinds of fiction by and/or about sf/f/h writers would be permitted, as well as non-fiction of a sort related to one of the above (e.g., speculative science books or mythographies). Reviews of individual episodes or issues of continuing TV series, comic books, etc., would most likely _not_ be permitted; however, reviews of such series as a whole, or of large "arcs" of such series, would most likely be permitted. As noted, however, this would be up to the judgement of the sitting moderator, as influenced by the readership. Multiple reviews of the same work(s) will be welcome, as will single reviews of multiple works. Comments on reviews will be passed to the newsgroup on a _highly_ selective basis: generally, they must say something new about the work, rather than simply discussing the review. This is not intended to stifle debate but to keep the content/noise ratio as high as possible. From tale@uunet.uu.net Wed Sep 3 00:15:03 1997 Path: news.isc.org!bounce-back From: tale@uunet.uu.net (David C Lawrence) Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.reviews Subject: cmsg newgroup rec.arts.sf.reviews moderated Control: newgroup rec.arts.sf.reviews moderated Approved: newgroups-request@isc.org Message-ID: <873270000.6284@isc.org> Date: Wed, 03 Sep 1997 07:00:00 GMT Lines: 42 X-Info: ftp://ftp.isc.org/pub/pgpcontrol/README.html ftp://ftp.isc.org/pub/pgpcontrol/README X-PGP-Sig: 2.6.2 Subject,Control,Message-ID,Date,From,Sender iQCVAwUBNA0K8cJdOtO4janBAQHvHAQAoyHZBUcdDqL1hkW1pvCwgFUW/TpKy2sy SZVAme27sII8u5HYqUvnDerKaql5B1FyTMFC3rkHa0cxOIMU8mZUa1ac/dlFDv97 gKB99dYjwZjAqEJyAs9kQsdwU49YHpdqd1FCdvGkclIod+HRIXqpVegNR5dJXPJo W3YmuRqgzeE= =ytAH Xref: news.isc.org control.newgroup:9240 rec.arts.sf.reviews is a moderated newsgroup which passed its vote for creation by 714:86 as reported in news.announce.newgroups on 13 Oct 1991. Group submission address: sf-reviews@postmodern.com Moderator contact address: sf-reviews@postmodern.com (Michael C. Berch, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes, Evelyn Leeper, Wayne Throop, Alan Wexelblat, & Bill Wisner) For your newsgroups file: rec.arts.sf.reviews Critiques of science fiction stories. (Moderated) The charter, culled from the call for votes: rec.arts.sf-reviews will be a moderated newsgroup, under shared moderation, whose purpose is to distribute reviews and critical reviews of works of interest to the science fiction/fantasy/horror community. "Works" includes but is not limited to: books, short stories, movies, "graphic novels," and any other publically-available media. "Of interest to the sf/f/h community" will be interpreted liberally by the sitting moderator. The discussion period for the creation of this group has led to the conclusion that nonfiction or other kinds of fiction by and/or about sf/f/h writers would be permitted, as well as non-fiction of a sort related to one of the above (e.g., speculative science books or mythographies). Reviews of individual episodes or issues of continuing TV series, comic books, etc., would most likely _not_ be permitted; however, reviews of such series as a whole, or of large "arcs" of such series, would most likely be permitted. As noted, however, this would be up to the judgement of the sitting moderator, as influenced by the readership. Multiple reviews of the same work(s) will be welcome, as will single reviews of multiple works. Comments on reviews will be passed to the newsgroup on a _highly_ selective basis: generally, they must say something new about the work, rather than simply discussing the review. This is not intended to stifle debate but to keep the content/noise ratio as high as possible.