From tale@uunet.uu.net Thu Mar 11 12:13:37 1993 Control: newgroup rec.arts.startrek.reviews moderated Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.reviews Path: uunet!tale From: tale@uunet.uu.net (David C Lawrence) Subject: newgroup rec.arts.startrek.reviews moderated Approved: tale@uunet.uu.net Sender: tale@uunet.uu.net (David C Lawrence) Organization: UUNET Technologies, Inc Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1993 17:13:27 GMT Message-ID: Lines: 64 Xref: uunet control:581244 rec.arts.startrek.reviews is a moderated newsgroup which passed its vote for creation by 466:114 as reported in news.announce.newgroups on 4 Mar 1993. Group submission address: trek-review-l@cornell.edu Moderator contact address: mss1@cornell.edu (Michael Shappe) For your newsgroups file: rec.arts.startrek.reviews Reviews of Star Trek books, episodes, films, &c. (Moderated) The charter, culled from the call for votes: Rec.arts.startrek.reviews is a moderated newsgroup exclusively for reviews of "Star Trek" episodes, books, comics, and related items (just "episodes" in the rest of the charter, for brevity). It is open to all incarnations of Star Trek: the original series, the Next Generation, Deep Space Nine, and any others that pop up in the future. A "review" is defined as an original (non-followup) article that expresses and justifies an opinion about a particular episode. The moderator has the power to reject articles that aren't appropriate for the group. Articles may not be rejected on the basis of the opinions expressed, but might be rejected for either of the following reasons, among others: - The article states an opinion ("I hated the episode") without any discussion of WHY the poster thinks that, or with so little discussion ("because it had awful FX") that it's not useful to others seeking insight into the episode. - The article is very poorly written. The moderator would be expected to be generous here, but has the power to reject completely incoherent messages that don't convey any clear opinion. Followups will be directed to r.a.s.current or r.a.s.misc, or to other more appropriate groups in the r.a.s. heirarchy should any appear in the future. Reviews will be crossposted to the appropriate rec.arts.startrek.* group (e.g. rec.arts.startrek.current) so that readers of those groups will still enjoy the same reviews they always have. Reviewers may request that their reviews not be crossposted, but followups will be directed to the appropriate discussion group in any case. All reviews will include proper spoiler protection, and will have descriptive Subject lines containing the name of the episode in question, as well as standard abbreviations, listed below, identifying the subject of the review. The moderator has the power (but is not required) to allow regular reviewers to post directly to the moderated group, provided they agree to adhere to this charter. This will help keep the group timely and reduce the impact of the moderator going on vacation. A regular reviewer is anyone who has submitted six consecutive articles to the group without rejections. If one of those people posts an article that doesn't belong in r.a.s.reviews (as determined by the moderator), the moderator may cancel the article in question. Subject lines will look like this: Subject: Review: Where <show> is one of TOS, TAS, TNG, or DS9, <type> is one of EPISODE, MOVIE, BOOK, COMIC, MERCHANDISE, or EVENT, and <title> is the title of the article, which must include the name of the episode. The moderator may add keywords to the list as appropriate, for example if another TV series starts or if another <type> is needed. Review: may be omitted if it appears in the title (Subject: TNG MOVIE Clinton's Spoiler Review: "Yesterday's Enterprise Zone"). From news@saunix.sau.edu Fri Aug 22 12:06:06 1997 Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.reviews Message-ID: <5tkmfu$5c197@news.sau.edu> From: news@saunix.sau.edu Approved: news@saunix.sau.edu NNTP-Posting-Host: news.sau.edu Path: news.isc.org!vixie!data.ramona.vix.com!nnrp1.crl.com!news.znet.com!www.nntp.primenet.com!globalcenter1!news.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!infeed2.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!167.142.225.6!newsrelay.netins.net!news.sau.edu!news.sau.edu Date: 22 Aug 1997 18:41:02 GMT Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Subject: cmsg newgroup rec.arts.startrek.reviews y Control: newgroup rec.arts.startrek.reviews y Lines: 3 Xref: news.isc.org control.newgroup:8851 Control message generated by Netscape Collabra Server. From group-admin@isc.org Tue Sep 2 18:00:11 1997 Path: news.isc.org!bounce-back From: group-admin@isc.org (David C Lawrence) Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.reviews Subject: cmsg newgroup rec.arts.startrek.reviews moderated Control: newgroup rec.arts.startrek.reviews moderated Approved: newgroups-request@isc.org Message-ID: <873247789.5311@isc.org> Date: Wed, 03 Sep 1997 00:49:50 GMT Lines: 64 X-Info: ftp://ftp.isc.org/pub/pgpcontrol/README.html ftp://ftp.isc.org/pub/pgpcontrol/README X-PGP-Sig: 2.6.2 Subject,Control,Message-ID,Date,From,Sender iQCVAwUBNAy0LsJdOtO4janBAQG2OwP+J7MslzEWmyhQRZ/RlGcuiVdtP0jDTMTL SA0QaCHMD8BuWWzhf2F2JP6frbkHIplVTPRasRrBS/2OPsJ2nt43Qu/UR9DCAMGJ WFMxLzfmbnjvpbIGGECbwevdzNDCNPvIF2D2WVTAx7gwf/OwmKbULUyAx0Uw4FpI YxsWqQnRIBc= =t+pD Xref: news.isc.org control.newgroup:9223 rec.arts.startrek.reviews is a moderated newsgroup which passed its vote for creation by 466:114 as reported in news.announce.newgroups on 4 Mar 1993. Group submission address: trek-reviews@ravenna.com Moderator contact address: trek-reviews-request@ravenna.com (Scott Forbes) For your newsgroups file: rec.arts.startrek.reviews Reviews of Star Trek books, episodes, films, &c. (Moderated) The charter, culled from the call for votes: Rec.arts.startrek.reviews is a moderated newsgroup exclusively for reviews of "Star Trek" episodes, books, comics, and related items (just "episodes" in the rest of the charter, for brevity). It is open to all incarnations of Star Trek: the original series, the Next Generation, Deep Space Nine, and any others that pop up in the future. A "review" is defined as an original (non-followup) article that expresses and justifies an opinion about a particular episode. The moderator has the power to reject articles that aren't appropriate for the group. Articles may not be rejected on the basis of the opinions expressed, but might be rejected for either of the following reasons, among others: - The article states an opinion ("I hated the episode") without any discussion of WHY the poster thinks that, or with so little discussion ("because it had awful FX") that it's not useful to others seeking insight into the episode. - The article is very poorly written. The moderator would be expected to be generous here, but has the power to reject completely incoherent messages that don't convey any clear opinion. Followups will be directed to r.a.s.current or r.a.s.misc, or to other more appropriate groups in the r.a.s. heirarchy should any appear in the future. Reviews will be crossposted to the appropriate rec.arts.startrek.* group (e.g. rec.arts.startrek.current) so that readers of those groups will still enjoy the same reviews they always have. Reviewers may request that their reviews not be crossposted, but followups will be directed to the appropriate discussion group in any case. All reviews will include proper spoiler protection, and will have descriptive Subject lines containing the name of the episode in question, as well as standard abbreviations, listed below, identifying the subject of the review. The moderator has the power (but is not required) to allow regular reviewers to post directly to the moderated group, provided they agree to adhere to this charter. This will help keep the group timely and reduce the impact of the moderator going on vacation. A regular reviewer is anyone who has submitted six consecutive articles to the group without rejections. If one of those people posts an article that doesn't belong in r.a.s.reviews (as determined by the moderator), the moderator may cancel the article in question. Subject lines will look like this: Subject: <show> <type> Review: <title> Where <show> is one of TOS, TAS, TNG, or DS9, <type> is one of EPISODE, MOVIE, BOOK, COMIC, MERCHANDISE, or EVENT, and <title> is the title of the article, which must include the name of the episode. The moderator may add keywords to the list as appropriate, for example if another TV series starts or if another <type> is needed. Review: may be omitted if it appears in the title (Subject: TNG MOVIE Clinton's Spoiler Review: "Yesterday's Enterprise Zone"). From tale@uunet.uu.net Wed Sep 3 00:15:04 1997 Path: news.isc.org!bounce-back From: tale@uunet.uu.net (David C Lawrence) Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.reviews Subject: cmsg newgroup rec.arts.startrek.reviews moderated Control: newgroup rec.arts.startrek.reviews moderated Approved: newgroups-request@isc.org Message-ID: <873270001.6296@isc.org> Date: Wed, 03 Sep 1997 07:00:01 GMT Lines: 64 X-Info: ftp://ftp.isc.org/pub/pgpcontrol/README.html ftp://ftp.isc.org/pub/pgpcontrol/README X-PGP-Sig: 2.6.2 Subject,Control,Message-ID,Date,From,Sender iQCVAwUBNA0K8sJdOtO4janBAQE1rgP/ZZkXiH5+cP0YDV+YABmB8p+BBVQj+kDf byq3jUJk2cPvQnZRSbIKxRfHOZc+zpAaXt8F6+bLS+aI2CDWxw67xgXZc5XZZ7Ov M1bdBINJYEmPr3s81XoPo4ZF3Y37DZYfgz9oc4qNCB0JEUOjI5dLW8OJ6bfAPznH NN3EIMmMnDE= =1U7u Xref: news.isc.org control.newgroup:9241 rec.arts.startrek.reviews is a moderated newsgroup which passed its vote for creation by 466:114 as reported in news.announce.newgroups on 4 Mar 1993. Group submission address: trek-reviews@ravenna.com Moderator contact address: trek-reviews-request@ravenna.com (Scott Forbes) For your newsgroups file: rec.arts.startrek.reviews Reviews of Star Trek books, episodes, films, &c. (Moderated) The charter, culled from the call for votes: Rec.arts.startrek.reviews is a moderated newsgroup exclusively for reviews of "Star Trek" episodes, books, comics, and related items (just "episodes" in the rest of the charter, for brevity). It is open to all incarnations of Star Trek: the original series, the Next Generation, Deep Space Nine, and any others that pop up in the future. A "review" is defined as an original (non-followup) article that expresses and justifies an opinion about a particular episode. The moderator has the power to reject articles that aren't appropriate for the group. Articles may not be rejected on the basis of the opinions expressed, but might be rejected for either of the following reasons, among others: - The article states an opinion ("I hated the episode") without any discussion of WHY the poster thinks that, or with so little discussion ("because it had awful FX") that it's not useful to others seeking insight into the episode. - The article is very poorly written. The moderator would be expected to be generous here, but has the power to reject completely incoherent messages that don't convey any clear opinion. Followups will be directed to r.a.s.current or r.a.s.misc, or to other more appropriate groups in the r.a.s. heirarchy should any appear in the future. Reviews will be crossposted to the appropriate rec.arts.startrek.* group (e.g. rec.arts.startrek.current) so that readers of those groups will still enjoy the same reviews they always have. Reviewers may request that their reviews not be crossposted, but followups will be directed to the appropriate discussion group in any case. All reviews will include proper spoiler protection, and will have descriptive Subject lines containing the name of the episode in question, as well as standard abbreviations, listed below, identifying the subject of the review. The moderator has the power (but is not required) to allow regular reviewers to post directly to the moderated group, provided they agree to adhere to this charter. This will help keep the group timely and reduce the impact of the moderator going on vacation. A regular reviewer is anyone who has submitted six consecutive articles to the group without rejections. If one of those people posts an article that doesn't belong in r.a.s.reviews (as determined by the moderator), the moderator may cancel the article in question. Subject lines will look like this: Subject: <show> <type> Review: <title> Where <show> is one of TOS, TAS, TNG, or DS9, <type> is one of EPISODE, MOVIE, BOOK, COMIC, MERCHANDISE, or EVENT, and <title> is the title of the article, which must include the name of the episode. The moderator may add keywords to the list as appropriate, for example if another TV series starts or if another <type> is needed. Review: may be omitted if it appears in the title (Subject: TNG MOVIE Clinton's Spoiler Review: "Yesterday's Enterprise Zone").